Salman Abedi Wiki – Salman Abedi Biography
By the time Salman Abedi detonated a bomb at an Ariana Grande concert in May 2017, killing 22 innocents, he had already been on the radar of the security services for seven years. The Manchester bomber had first been flagged by MI5 in 2010 when he was just 15 years old, the first in a long line of brushes with anti-terror agencies. These included his decision to travel to Libya and his subsequent evacuation by the Royal Navy, and spies intercepting his apparent connections with ISIS and Al Qaeda.
The father of the youngest victim of the Manchester Arena bombing last night rejected an apology from the head of MI5 over his spies’ missed chance to foil the plot. In a rare on-camera statement, the agency’s director general, Ken McCallum, said he was ‘profoundly sorry’ that the May 2017 attack that claimed 22 lives was not prevented. But retired High Court judge Sir John Saunders, chairman of the inquiry into the atrocity, yesterday accused MI5 of a ‘significant missed opportunity’ to stop it, leaving loved ones of those killed furious.
Salman Abedi Age
Salman Abedi is 22 years old.
Incident Detail
Mr McCallum insisted there had been only a ‘slim chance’ that officers could have learnt Salman Abedi was planning his attack as a concert by pop star Ariana Grande finished. But Andrew Roussos, 49, whose eight-year-old daughter Saffie-Rose was among the victims, said evidence showed MI5 had ‘loads of chances’. Abedi had been on the authorities’ radar at least 23 times since 2010.
Blasting Mr McCallum for ‘not taking responsibility for your own actions’, Mr Roussos said the report uncovered a ‘cataclysmic failure’ by MI5 which demonstrated that the agency was ‘not fit to keep us safe and therefore not fit for purpose’.‘How can he apologise for losing my eight-year-old daughter when the evidence is so strong?’ he told Sky News.
‘In the apology, he states there was a slim chance. I find that quite insulting when the evidence shows from 2010 right up to 2017 they didn’t have a slim chance, they had loads of chances.’ While thanking Sir John for his thoroughness, Mr Roussos said the report had not been sufficiently ‘hard-hitting’. He spoke as bungling spies were also slammed by mothers of victims Liam Curry, 19, and his girlfriend Chloe Rutherford, 17, for ‘playing a part in the murder of our children’.
Caroline Curry and Lisa Rutherford said they could ‘never forgive’ the spy agency following the publication of the third and final report of the public inquiry. Had MI5 acted on two pieces of intelligence they were given and so put the bomber under surveillance, they could have uncovered his plan, Sir John said. The nature of the information MI5 received about Abedi was given to the inquiry behind closed doors, so may never be made public.
In an excoriating attack after the report was published, Mrs Curry, 52, said: ‘From top to bottom, MI5 to the associates of the attacker, we will always believe that you all played a part in the murder of our children.’ The first report, published in 2021 focused on security at the Arena and highlighted ‘missed opportunities’ to identify Abedi as a threat before he detonated his device. The second, unveiled last November, exposed how shocking failings by emergency services left victims of the blast ‘dying without dignity’ – and said there was a chance that two, including Saffie-Rose, could have survived with better care. ‘
So many people being paid that night to protect our kids, and yet so many failed in their duties,’ said a tearful Mrs Curry, of South Shields. ‘Professionals that had responsibility but clearly had other priorities. Security staff that even when told of the danger failed to act appropriately. Once again, we’ll never forgive you.’ As well as killing 22, plus Abedi, the backpack blast left hundreds injured.
Sir John highlighted how the two pieces of information about Abedi in the run-up to the attack were assessed by MI5 not to relate to terrorism – despite him being on its radar for seven years. In closed hearings, the spy involved admitted they considered one to represent a possible pressing national security concern – but did not discuss it with colleagues straight away and did not write up a report on the same day.
In his 207-page report, Sir John said MI5 had failed to ‘act swiftly enough’ – and that the delay ‘led to the missing of an opportunity to take a potentially important investigative action’. Abedi was then on a month-long trip to Libya where Sir John concluded he received ‘specific training in how to assemble an IED (improvised explosive device)’.
Had the intelligence been investigated – which Sir John concluded ‘should have happened’ – Abedi could have been placed under surveillance on his return from Libya four days before the bombing. In addition, spies could have followed Abedi to the car he used to hide a quantity of TATP, known as ‘mother of Satan’, the explosive used in the bomb. Had these steps happened, the inquiry head said, ‘the attack might have been prevented’.
Sir John said the threat posed by radicalized children from Libyan families such as Abedi and his brother Hashem, who is serving a life sentence with a minimum term of 55 years for assisting in the attack, had been known since 2010. The president’s security recommendations services will be published in a confidential document later. In response, Mr. McCallum said: “I deeply regret that no such intelligence was obtained.
Gathering covert intelligence is difficult, but if we had managed to take advantage of the small opportunity we had, those affected may not have experienced such terrible loss and trauma. “I deeply regret that MI5 did not prevent the attack.” Vowing to act on Sir John’s upcoming recommendations, he added: “We will continue to do everything in our power to keep our country safe from hidden threats.” MI5 exists to stop atrocities.”
Andy Burnham, the Labor mayor of Greater Manchester, said the three volumes had exposed that “the country was not prepared for a terrorist attack of this nature in a city like ours.” And the Head of Anti-Terrorism Watch, Matt Jukes, said he was “regrettable” that despite the organization’s “strong partnership” with MI5, we “failed to stop the loss of life” in 2017.
Meanwhile, the spokesman for the Prime Minister said Mr Blasting McCallum for ‘failing to take responsibility for his own actions’, Roussos said the report uncovered a ‘catastrophic failure’ by MI5 which showed the agency was ‘unfit to keep us safe and therefore therefore not fit for purpose’. “How can you apologize for losing my eight-year-old daughter when the evidence is so strong?” he told Sky News.
In the apology, he states that there was a slim chance. I find it quite insulting when the evidence shows that from 2010 to 2017 they didn’t have a slim chance, they had a very good chance.” While thanking Sir John for his thoroughness, Mr Roussos said the report had not been “harsh” enough. -hitting’. He spoke as the botched spies were also criticized by the mothers of victims Liam Curry, 19, and his girlfriend Chloe Rutherford, 17, for “participating in the murder of our children.”
Caroline Curry and Lisa Rutherford said they would “never forgive” the spy agency after the release of the third and final report of the public inquiry. If MI5 had acted on two pieces of intelligence they were given and put the terrorist under surveillance, they might have discovered his plan, Sir John said. The nature of the information MI5 received about Abedi was handed over to the investigation behind closed doors, so it may never be made public.
In an excoriating attack after the report was published, Ms Curry, 52, said: “From top to bottom, from MI5 to the attacker’s associates, we will always believe that you all played a role in the murder of our children. “. The first report, published in 2021, focused on security at the Arena and highlighted “missed opportunities” to identify Abedi as a threat before he detonated his device.
The second, launched last November, exposed how shocking failures by emergency services left blast victims “dying without dignity”, and said there was a possibility that two, including Saffie-Rose, could have survived with better care. “So many people who were paid that night to protect our children and yet so many failed in their duties,” said Mrs Curry, of South Shields, through tears. “Professionals who had responsibility but clearly had other priorities.
Security personnel who, even when informed of the danger, did not act appropriately. Once again, we will never forgive you.” In addition to killing 22, plus Abedi, the backpack blast injured hundreds. Sir John highlighted how MI5 assessed the two pieces of information about Abedi in the lead up to the attack as not being related to terrorism, despite the fact that he had been on their radar for seven years. In closed hearings, the spy involved admitted that he considered one to pose a potentially pressing national security concern, but did not immediately discuss it with his colleagues and did not write a report the same day.
In his 207-page report, Sir John said MI5 had not “acted quickly enough” and that the delay “led to the loss of an opportunity to take potentially important investigative action”. Abedi was then on a month-long trip to Libya, where Sir John concluded that he received “specific training on how to assemble an IED (improvised explosive device)”. Had the intelligence been investigated, which Sir John concluded “should have happened”, Abedi could have been placed under surveillance upon his return from Libya four days before the bombing.
Furthermore, spies may have followed Abedi to the car he used to conceal a quantity of TATP, known as ‘mother of Satan’, the explosive used in the bomb. If these steps had occurred, the head of investigation said, “the attack could have been prevented.” Sir John said the threat posed by radicalized children from Libyan families such as Abedi and his brother Hashem, who is serving a life sentence with a minimum term of 55 for assisting in the attack, had been known since 2010.
The president’s recommendations to the security services will be published in a confidential document at a later date. In response, Mr. McCallum said: “I deeply regret that no such intelligence was obtained. Gathering covert intelligence is difficult, but if we had managed to take advantage of the small opportunity we had, those affected may not have experienced such terrible loss and trauma. “I deeply regret that MI5 did not prevent the attack.”
Vowing to act on Sir John’s next recommendations, he added: “We will continue to do everything in our power to keep our country safe from hidden threats. MI5 exists to stop atrocities.” Andy Burnham, the Labor mayor of Greater Manchester, said the three volumes had exposed that “the country was not prepared for a terrorist attack of this nature in a city like ours.” And the Head of Anti-Terrorism Policing, Matt Jukes, said he was “regrettable” that, despite the organization’s “strong partnership” with MI5, we “failed to stop the loss of life” in 2017.
While the Prime Minister’s spokesman said Mr McCallum blew up for ‘failing to take responsibility for his own actions’, Mr Roussos said the report uncovered a ‘catastrophic failure’ by MI5 that showed the agency ‘failed to he was in a position to keep us safe and secure.’ therefore, it is not fit for purpose’. “How can you apologize for losing my eight-year-old daughter when the evidence is so strong?” he told Sky News. In the apology, he states that there was a slim chance. I find it quite insulting when the evidence shows that from 2010 to 2017 they didn’t have a slim chance, they had a very good chance.” While thanking Sir John for his thoroughness, Mr Roussos said the report had not been “harsh” enough. -hitting’.
He spoke as the botched spies were also criticized by the mothers of victims Liam Curry, 19, and his girlfriend Chloe Rutherford, 17, for “participating in the murder of our children.” Caroline Curry and Lisa Rutherford said they would “never forgive” the spy agency after the release of the third and final report of the public inquiry. If MI5 had acted on two pieces of intelligence they were given and put the terrorist under surveillance, they might have discovered his plan, Sir John said.
The nature of the information MI5 received about Abedi was handed over to the investigation behind closed doors, so it may never be made public. In an excoriating attack after the report was published, Ms Curry, 52, said: “From top to bottom, from MI5 to the attacker’s associates, we will always believe that you all played a part in the murder of our children”.
The first report, published in 2021, focused on security at the Arena and highlighted “missed opportunities” to identify Abedi as a threat before he detonated his device. The second, launched last November, exposed how shocking failures by emergency services left blast victims “dying without dignity”, and said there was a possibility that two, including Saffie-Rose, could have survived with better care.
“So many people who were paid that night to protect our children and yet so many failed in their duties,” said Mrs Curry, of South Shields, through tears. “Professionals who had responsibility but clearly had other priorities. Security personnel who, even when informed of the danger, did not act appropriately. Once again, we will never forgive you.” In addition to killing 22, plus Abedi, the backpack blast injured hundreds.
Sir John highlighted how MI5 assessed the two pieces of information about Abedi in the lead up to the attack as not being related to terrorism, despite the fact that he had been on their radar for seven years.
In closed hearings, the spy involved admitted that he considered one to pose a potentially pressing national security concern, but did not immediately discuss it with his colleagues and did not write a report the same day. In his 207-page report, Sir John said MI5 had not “acted quickly enough” and that the delay “led to the loss of an opportunity to take potentially important investigative action”.
Abedi was then on a month-long trip to Libya, where Sir John concluded that he received “specific training on how to assemble an IED (improvised explosive device)”. Had the intelligence been investigated, which Sir John concluded “should have happened”, Abedi could have been placed under surveillance upon his return from Libya four days before the bombing. Furthermore, spies may have followed Abedi to the car he used to conceal a quantity of TATP, known as ‘mother of Satan’, the explosive used in the bomb.
If these steps had occurred, the head of investigation said, “the attack could have been prevented.” Sir John said the threat posed by radicalized children from Libyan families such as Abedi and his brother Hashem, who is serving a life sentence with a minimum term of 55 years for assisting in the attack, had been known since 2010.
The president’s recommendations to the security services will be published in a confidential document at a later date. In response, Mr. McCallum said: “I deeply regret that no such intelligence was obtained. Gathering covert intelligence is difficult, but if we had managed to take advantage of the small opportunity we had, those affected may not have experienced such terrible loss and trauma. ”
I deeply regret that MI5 did not prevent the attack.” Vowing to act on Sir John’s upcoming recommendations, he added: “We will continue to do everything in our power to keep our country safe from hidden threats.” MI5 exists to stop atrocities.” Andy Burnham, the Labor mayor of Greater Manchester, said the three volumes had exposed that “the country was not prepared for a terrorist attack of this nature in a city like ours.” And the Head of Anti-Terrorism Watch, Matt Jukes, said he was “regrettable” that despite the organization’s “strong partnership” with MI5, we “failed to stop the loss of life” in 2017.
Meanwhile, the spokesman for the Prime Minister said Mr Blasting McCallum for ‘failing to take responsibility for his own actions’, Roussos said the report uncovered a ‘catastrophic failure’ by MI5 which showed the agency was ‘unfit to keep us safe and therefore therefore not fit for purpose’.”How can you apologize for losing my eight-year-old daughter when the evidence is so strong?” he told Sky News. In the apology, he states that there was a slim chance.
I find it quite insulting when the evidence shows that from 2010 to 2017 they didn’t have a slim chance, they had a very good chance.” While thanking Sir John for his thoroughness, Mr Roussos said the report had not been “harsh” enough. -hitting’. He spoke as the botched spies were also criticized by the mothers of victims Liam Curry, 19, and his girlfriend Chloe Rutherford, 17, for “participating in the murder of our children.” Caroline Curry and Lisa Rutherford said they would “never forgive” the spy agency after the release of the third and final report of the public inquiry. If MI5 had acted on two pieces of intelligence they were given and put the terrorist under surveillance, they might have discovered his plan, Sir John said.
The nature of the information MI5 received about Abedi was handed over to the investigation behind closed doors, so it may never be made public. In an excoriating attack after the report was published, Ms Curry, 52, said: “From top to bottom, from MI5 to the attacker’s associates, we will always believe that you all played a part in the murder of our children”.
The first report, released in 2021, focused on security at the Arena, highlighting “missed opportunities” to identify Abedi as a threat before he detonated his device. The second, launched last November, exposed how shocking failures by emergency services left blast victims “dying without dignity”, and said there was a possibility that two, including Saffie-Rose, could have survived with better care.
“So many people who were paid that night to protect our children and yet so many failed in their duties,” said Mrs Curry, of South Shields, through tears. “Professionals who had responsibility but clearly had other priorities. Security personnel who, even when informed of the danger, did not act appropriately. Once again, we will never forgive you.” In addition to killing 22, plus Abedi, the backpack blast injured hundreds.
Sir John highlighted how MI5 assessed the two pieces of information about Abedi in the lead up to the attack as not being related to terrorism, despite the fact that he had been on their radar for seven years. In closed hearings, the spy involved admitted that he considered one to pose a potentially pressing national security concern, but did not immediately discuss it with his colleagues and did not write a report the same day.
In his 207-page report, Sir John said MI5 had not “acted quickly enough” and that the delay “led to the loss of an opportunity to take potentially important investigative action”. Abedi was then on a month-long trip to Libya, where Sir John concluded that he received “specific training on how to assemble an IED (improvised explosive device)”.
Had the intelligence been investigated, which Sir John concluded “should have happened”, Abedi could have been placed under surveillance upon his return from Libya four days before the bombing. Furthermore, spies may have followed Abedi to the car he used to conceal a quantity of TATP, known as ‘mother of Satan’, the explosive used in the bomb.
If these steps had occurred, the head of investigation said, “the attack could have been prevented.” Sir John said the threat posed by radicalized children from Libyan families such as Abedi and his brother Hashem, who is serving a life sentence with a minimum term of 55 for assisting in the attack, had been known since 2010.
The president’s recommendations to the security services will be published in a confidential document at a later date. In response, Mr. McCallum said: “I deeply regret that no such intelligence was obtained. Gathering covert intelligence is difficult, but if we had managed to take advantage of the small opportunity we had, those affected may not have experienced such terrible loss and trauma. “I deeply regret that MI5 did not prevent the attack.”
Vowing to act on Sir John’s upcoming recommendations, he added: “We will continue to do everything in our power to keep our country safe from hidden threats.” MI5 exists to stop atrocities.”Andy Burnham, the Labor mayor of Greater Manchester, said the three volumes had exposed that “the country was not prepared for a terrorist attack of this nature in a city like ours.” And the Head of Anti-Terrorism Policing, Matt Jukes, said he was “regrettable” that, despite the organization’s “strong partnership” with MI5, we “failed to stop the loss of life” in 2017.
Read Also: Who is Larry Padgett? Wiki, Biography, Age, Family, Incident Detail
