Adriana Kuch Wiki – Adriana Kuch Biography
Following the tragic death of Adriana Kuch, who committed suicide after being bullied at Berkeley’s Central Regional High School, the internet wants the names of the girls who assaulted her revealed. However, they have not been publicly identified as they are minors.
Four girls have been suspended indefinitely after Adriana died by suicide hours after a video of her being bullied surfaced online. This was confirmed by the district superintendent Triantafillos Parlapanides on Thursday, February 9. The 14-year-old committed suicide at her Bayville home on February 3.
Adriana Kuch Age
Adriana Kuch was 14 years old.
Video of the attack, which has surfaced on social media, shows Adriana walking down the hall when a girl attacks her and begins hitting her in the face with a water bottle. Adriana is seen falling to the ground as the girl continues to attack her. Cheers are heard in the background, according to NJ.com.
At the time, the 14-year-old lay bruised and bloody on the ground. Some Twitter users suggested that the four girls should be identified and held accountable. Some even questioned their races. “Where are the identities of the 4 thugs? Where is the justice of Adriana Kuch?” one user wrote. “What were the demographics of the attackers? I would like to know,” said another. ”
What a tragic, tragic story. Someone must be held accountable! Bullying should have serious consequences. Who is protecting these children?” said one user, while another wrote, “the school didn’t take her to the hospital or call the police because the district thinks that’s wrong.
name/shame family 4 N.J., students demand change after Adriana Olivia Kuch , 14, dies by suicide after being beaten by 4 students who put him online.” “Four of the bullies, along with the school principal and teachers, are also responsible for this as they are sweeping it under the rug. Where are their identities? Where is the justice for Adriana Kuch?” wrote a user.
Unsubstantiated claims about the color of the girls who harassed Adriana began to circulate on social media. People started bringing race into the conversation about the attack, but Michael set the record straight. In a Facebook post, he wrote: “People send me crap like this, I’m not here to talk about race.
Adriana was beautiful and loved everyone. She didn’t care about race, the world would be a better place if everyone was so colorblind like her”. School administrators often order journalists not to identify minors who were involved in bullying and other wrongdoing. Many have questioned the legality of these restrictions considering the serious consequences that student offenses have had.
Here’s what the court says, according to The Student Press Law Center: “In a unanimous 1979 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. Daily Mail that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to use the names of minors in newsworthy stories as long as the information is “obtained legally” and “faithfully. High school student who allegedly shot and killed a 15-year-old classmate.”
After the ruling, other courts also followed suit. Many of them ruled that “newspapers may publish the name of a minor accused of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and hit-and-run, the name of a 7-year-old boy who was severely beaten, the name of a high school student attacked.”
viciously by his classmates at school, the name and photo of a 12-year-old boy charged with the attempted murder of a police officer, the names of minors who testified in a trial in which the adult defendants were charged of supplying alcohol to minors, the photograph of a minor girl taken in her mother’s arms on the courthouse steps after a highly publicized paternity hearing, and the name and course of mental health treatment of a person convicted of assault sex when she was 14, but was no longer a minor at the time of publication.”
However, juvenile court proceedings and records in several states may be closed to the public, and in some states, judges may “close those portions of adult trials that require juvenile testimony or evidence.” In cases like these, a judge decides whether or not to allow access. “In such cases, judges have occasionally placed conditions on reporters’ access to closed juvenile proceedings by allowing them to enter, but only after they have promised not to disclose certain information about minor participants that might be revealed during the process.
Such conditions are likely valid,” the website says. Even in sealed cases, however, the power of judges to restrict press coverage is limited. The website gives one example, saying: “A California appeals court struck down an order that prohibited reporters admitted to a juvenile custody proceeding from disclosing virtually any information about the children involved, including the prohibition on interviewing the children without the presence of an attorney, interview their caregivers with the minors present, interview any mental health professional to whom the minors have been referred, or “do any act in the future that may interfere with reunification or have a negative impact on the provision of reunification services”.
Despite the above rules, a law called the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which was enacted in 1974, protects the privacy of student education records. This applies to any public or private elementary, secondary, or post-secondary school. The law “gives parents or eligible students more control over their education records” and “prohibits educational institutions from disclosing “personally identifiable information in education records” without the written consent of an eligible student, or if the student is minor, the student’s parents,” according to Public Health Professionals Gateway.
Read Also: Who is Kylie Kelce? Wiki, Biography, Age, Family, Incident Detail